Navigation menu

European Union Emission Trading Scheme


The EU emissions trading system (EU ETS) is a cornerstone of the EU's policy to combat climate change and its key tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions cost-effectively. It is the world's first major carbon market and remains the biggest one. The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) • The EU ETS is the cornerstone of the European Union’s drive to reduce its emissions of man-made greenhouse gases which are largely responsible for warming the planet and causing climate change.

The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) • The EU ETS is the cornerstone of the European Union’s drive to reduce its emissions of man-made greenhouse gases which are largely responsible for warming the planet and causing climate change.

This report analyses the implications for the Phase II carbon market and the resulting industrial abatement incentives and the wider lessons to be learned from the allocation process. This report, based on collaborative research with Climate Strategies, examines the workings of the EU ETS to date and offers analysis and recommendations on its future development.

The study identifies seven key challenges to overcome for the second phase of the EU ETS and sets out the Carbon Trust's own conclusions and recommendations for the future of the EU ETS as an instrument that can both help business deliver emission reductions as efficiently as possible, and also protect and ultimately enhance business competitiveness in a CO 2 -constrained world.

It presents our analysis of combined insights from economic modelling and a stakeholder interview programme. The scheme is the world's largest carbon-trading scheme. It provides an incentive for installations to reduce their carbon emissions, because they can then sell their surplus allowances.

Installations are included in the scheme on the basis of their Carbon Dioxide CO2 emitting activities. Industries that are covered include:. Tools and resources Tools View all tools.

Contact us Live Chat. Please tick to subscribe to our newsletter sent monthly. See further details below on: During this phase, every EU member state: Operated the Scheme Installations were obliged to monitor and report verified carbon emissions At the end of each year, installations were obliged to surrender sufficient allowances to cover their emissions and could buy additional allowances or sell any surplus Joint Implementation JI and Clean Development Mechanism CDM credits could be used within the scheme, through the 'Linking Directive', agreed in How the EU ETS works now Phase III started in and run until The biggest changes in Phase III are: Newbery wrote that "[there] is no case for repeating such a wilful misuse of the value of a common property resource that should be owned by the country".

The price of emissions permits tripled in the first six months of Phase I, collapsed by half in a one-week period in , and declined to zero over the next twelve months. Such movements and the implied volatility raise questions about the viability of this trading system to provide stable incentives to emitters.

This criticism has face validity. In future phases, measures such as banking of allowances and price floors may be used to mitigate volatility. Nonetheless, producers and consumers in those markets respond rationally and effectively to price signals.

Newbery commented that the EU ETS was not delivering the stable carbon price necessary for long-term, low-carbon investment decisions. The main theoretical advantage of allowing free trading of credits is that it allows mitigation to be done at least-cost CCC, , p.

In terms of the UK's climate change policy, CCC , noted three arguments against too great a reliance on credits:.

The ban includes nitrous oxide N2O from adipic acid production. The reasons given were the perverse incentives, the lack of additionality, the lack of environmental integrity,the under-mining of the Montreal Protocol, costs and ineffectiveness and the distorting effect of a few projects in advanced developing countries getting too many CERs. This is a way to avoid several problems of CDM and JI such as additionality, measurement, leakage, permanence, and verification.

Furthermore, it reduces the available allowances in the cap-and-trade system, which means that it reduces the emissions that can be produced by covered sources. The EU is negotiating a link with Switzerland's domestic trading system.

Linking [] systems creates a larger carbon market, which can reduce overall compliance costs, increase market liquidity and generate a more stable carbon market. Some scholars have argued that linking may provide a starting point for developing a new, bottom-up international climate policy architecture whereby multiple unique systems successively link their various systems. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This section's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia.

See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions. May Learn how and when to remove this template message. This article's Criticism or Controversy section may compromise the article's neutral point of view of the subject.

Please integrate the section's contents into the article as a whole, or rewrite the material. Origins, Allocation, and Early Results". Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Retrieved 5 June Centre for Sustainability Management, , p. Retrieved 19 April Climate Action - European Commission. Conservatives in the European Parliament. British Journal of Management. The role of carbon markets in preventing dangerous climate change.

The fourth report of the —10 session. Retrieved 30 April Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Archived from the original PDF on 14 January Retrieved 30 August Retrieved 6 June Climate Action Network Europe. Retrieved 1 May Minutes of Evidence, Tuesday 21 April The fourth report of the —10 session".

Retrieved 28 June Lessons to be learned". Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Initiative. Retrieved 25 October Europe's carbon trading scheme".

Archived from the original on 11 April Environmental and Resource Economics. Unethical, Unjust and Ineffective? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Retrieved 26 April European Commission Press Release. Retrieved 25 March Retrieved 28 October Retrieved 10 August The National Law Review.

Retrieved 4 June Retrieved 10 February Archived from the original PDF on 15 February Retrieved 27 January An Act To prohibit operators of civil aircraft of the United States from participating in the European Union's emissions trading scheme, and for other purposes. The New York Times. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Commission decides on first set of national allocation plans for the — trading period".

EU Europa Environment Committee. EU-wide cap for — set at 2. Retrieved 24 January Progress report to Parliament Committee on Climate Change. Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 36 1 of the Climate Change Act Retrieved 3 April Retrieved 6 January Retrieved 14 January The European Union's flagship climate policy, its emissions trading scheme ETS , saw the price of carbon crash to a record low on Thursday after a vote in Brussels against a proposal to support the struggling market.

Retrieved 18 February Transaction Costs and Tradable Permits: Retrieved 8 August Archived from the original on 28 November The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 16 April Oral and Written Evidence, Tuesday, 12 May Oral and Written Evidence, Tuesday 31 March Recent Emission-Reduction Policy Initiatives. Climate Change and the Global Economy N. World Economic and Financial Surveys: Housing and the Business Cycle". Retrieved 21 April Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Kyoto and Beyond U.

Thomson Reuters Point Carbon. Retrieved 28 November Retrieved 16 February Commission welcomes vote to ban certain industrial gas credits". Retrieved 18 September Opening negotiations with Switzerland on linking Emissions Trading Systems. Incremental Alignment of Cap-and-Trade Markets. To link or not to link: Climate Policy, 9 4 , —

Researchers Preston Teeter and Jorgen Sandberg have argued that it is largely the uncertainty behind the EU's scheme that has resulted in such a tepid and informal response by regulated organizations.

Closed On:

The EU ETS has seen a number of significant changes, with the first trading period described as a 'learning by doing' phase.

Copyright © 2015

Powered By